September 20th 2024 , In the 11th Circuit U.S Court of Appeals, Judge Elizabeth Branch reversed the judgement ruling the controversial "transgender drivers license policy" unconstitutional
It's been almost four years since the ACLU, Darcy Corbitt and two others filed a lawsuit against ALEA (Alabama Law Enforcement Agency) for depriving transgender citizens of driver licenses that reflect their gender.
[Policy Order 63 which requires anyone born in the state of Alabama to have a "sex change operation" and legally change their name in order to update the gender marker on driver licenses]
After years of court proceedings, a ruling the policies being enforced were unconstitutional, and appeals, we finally have a verdict, and it's an unfortunate one for the life and liberties of all Alabamians.
On September 20th 2024 , In the 11th Circuit U.S Court of Appeals, Judge Elizabeth Branch reversed the judgement ruling the policy unconstitutional. Citing that the policy
"does not single out or disadvantage individuals based on sex. Instead, the policy applies uniformly to all individuals seeking a change in their sex designation on state-issued documents. Policy Order 63 imposes the same objective conditions on everyone"
A statement that's facially true in regards to the policies neutral wording, but clearly false when considering what individuals are opting to change the sex marker on driver licenses.
Advocates for Trans Equality (A4TE), and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued the following statement in response to the ruling:
“We are deeply disappointed with the Court’s ruling. This decision puts transgender people in Alabama at risk. Living in a place that will not recognize who you are on something as essential as an identity document is not only horribly damaging to one’s psyche, but also puts transgender people at risk during every interaction where an ID is required.
“Transgender and nonbinary people in states across the country are being put in a double bind: it can be near impossible to access transgender health care, but surgery ‘proving’ their gender is required for them to get the identification documents they need to live their lives.”
This certainly was a disappointing outcome, but that doesn't mean all hope is gone. The U.S Constitution is not void where prohibited by law, as long as individuals are willing to stand up against discriminatory and illegal policies, it is an eventuality that this policy and others like it will be wiped from the books. Read more here: https://transequality.org/news/tldef-and-aclu-statement-response-federal-court-ruling-transgender-id-lawsuit
ALTRA IS T4T 🤍
ALTRA was made by trans people for trans people.
Through advocacy, education, and community outreach, we strive to uplift the transgender community and rights of all LGBT+ residents in the state
WEBSITE DISCLAIMER
The information provided by projectALTRA ("we," "us," or "our") on projectaltra.com (the "Site") is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the Site. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THE SITE OR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE SITE. YOUR USE OF THE SITE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION ON THE SITE IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK.
EXTERNAL LINKS DISCLAIMER
The Site may contain (or you may be sent through the Site) links to other websites or content belonging to or originating from third parties or links to websites and features in banners or other advertising. Such external links are not investigated, monitored, or checked for accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness by us. WE DO NOT WARRANT, ENDORSE, GUARANTEE, OR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF ANY INFORMATION OFFERED BY THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES LINKED THROUGH THE SITE OR ANY WEBSITE OR FEATURE LINKED IN ANY BANNER OR OTHER ADVERTISING. WE WILL NOT BE A PARTY TO OR IN ANY WAY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING ANY TRANSACTION BETWEEN YOU AND THIRD-PARTY PROVIDERS OF PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.
PROFESSIONAL DISCLAIMER
The Site cannot and does not contain legal advice. The legal information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based upon such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We do not provide any kind of legal advice. THE USE OR RELIANCE OF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE SITE IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK.
TESTIMONIALS DISCLAIMER
The Site may contain testimonials by users of our products and/or services. These testimonials reflect the real-life experiences and opinions of such users. However, the experiences are personal to those particular users, and may not necessarily be representative of all users of our products and/or services. We do not claim, and you should not assume, that all users will have the same experiences. YOUR INDIVIDUAL RESULTS MAY VARY.
The testimonials on the Site are submitted in various forms such as text, audio and/or video, and are reviewed by us before being posted.
The views and opinions contained in the testimonials belong solely to the individual user and do not reflect our views and opinions. We are not affiliated with users who provide testimonials, and users are not paid or otherwise compensated for their testimonials.